Difference between revisions of "Inventory: Understanding Average Cost"
		
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===Simple Case=== | ===Simple Case=== | ||
| Inventory Simple Case - Avg Cost IS impacted by Sequence!!! | Inventory Simple Case - Avg Cost IS impacted by Sequence!!! | ||
| + | {| | ||
| + | | width="50%" valign="top" | | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| ! TxType !! EFFCTV QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST !! TOTCOST !! ACCUMBAL !! AVGCOST | ! TxType !! EFFCTV QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST !! TOTCOST !! ACCUMBAL !! AVGCOST | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Beg Bal || 100 || 100 || 15 || 1500 || 1500 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -50 || 50 || 15 || -750 || 750 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 60 || 20 || 200 || 950 || 15.83333333 | 
| |} | |} | ||
| + | | width="50%" valign="top" | | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| ! TxType !! EFFCTV QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST !! TOTCOST !! ACCUMBAL !! AVGCOST | ! TxType !! EFFCTV QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST !! TOTCOST !! ACCUMBAL !! AVGCOST | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Beg Bal || 100 || 100 || 15 || 1500 || 1500 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 110 || 20 || 200 || 1700 || 15.45454545 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -50 || 60 || 15.45454545 || -772.7272727 || 927.2727273 || 15.45454545 | 
| + | |} | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| Line 26: | Line 30: | ||
| Inventory with a sale reversal, but keeping it positive!   All good, but sequence matters | Inventory with a sale reversal, but keeping it positive!   All good, but sequence matters | ||
| − | + | {| | |
| − | + | | width="33%" valign="top" | | |
| + | Here, a purchase receipt comes between the +Reversal and -Sale record. | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| − | ! TxType !!  | + | ! TxType !! QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST !! ACCUMBAL !! AVGCOST | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Beg Bal || 100 || 100 || 15 || 1500 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -50 || 50 || 15 || 750 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 60 || 20 || 950 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || 200 || 260 || 15.83333333 || 4116.666667 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 270 || 20 || 200 || 15.98765432 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -200 || 70 || 15.98765432 || 1119.135802 || 15.98765432 | 
| |} | |} | ||
| − | + | | width="33%" valign="top" | | |
| + | Here, The +Reversal comes immediatelyh before the -Sale record. | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| − | ! TxType !!  | + | ! TxType !! QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST !! ACCUMBAL !! AVGCOST | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Beg Bal || 100 || 100 || 15 || 1500 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -50 || 50 || 15 || 750 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 60 || 20 || 200 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || 200 || 260 || 15.83333333 || 4116.666667 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -200 || 60 || 15.83333333 || 950 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 70 || 20 || 1150 || 16.42857143 | 
| |} | |} | ||
| + | | width="33%" valign="top" | | ||
| If sale and reversal are together - it doesn't matter the sequence! | If sale and reversal are together - it doesn't matter the sequence! | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| − | ! TxType !!  | + | ! TxType !! QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST !! ACCUMBAL !! AVGCOST | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Beg Bal || 100 || 100 || 15 || 1500 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -50 || 50 || 15 || 750 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 60 || 20 || 950 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 70 || 20 || 1150 || 16.42857143 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || 200 || 270 || 16.42857143 || 4435.714286 || 16.42857143 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -200 || 70 || 16.42857143 || 1150 || 16.42857143 | 
| + | |} | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| Line 86: | Line 94: | ||
| Similar to the case where items were positive, the impact of matching Negative and Postive record have no net effect even when the accumlative qty goes negative: | Similar to the case where items were positive, the impact of matching Negative and Postive record have no net effect even when the accumlative qty goes negative: | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| − | ! TxType !! EFFCTV QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST  | + | ! TxType !! EFFCTV QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST !! ACCUMBAL !! AVGCOST | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Beg Bal || 100 || 100 || 15 || 1500 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -50 || 50 || 15 || 750 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 60 || 20 || 950 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -200 || -140 || 15.83333333 || -2216.666667 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || 200 || 60 || 15.83333333 || 950 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 70 || 20 || 200 || 16.42857143 | 
| |} | |} | ||
| | width="50%" valign="top" | | | width="50%" valign="top" | | ||
| Line 104: | Line 112: | ||
| If a purchase comes between a negative sale and reversal, the ending avg. cost is impacted, but this is still perfectly acceptable and correct handling for the data given. | If a purchase comes between a negative sale and reversal, the ending avg. cost is impacted, but this is still perfectly acceptable and correct handling for the data given. | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| − | ! TxType !! EFFCTV QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST  | + | ! TxType !! EFFCTV QTY !! ACCUMQTY !! COST !! ACCUMBAL !! AVGCOST | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Beg Bal || 100 || 100 || 15 || 1500 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -50 || 50 || 15 || 750 || 15 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || 60 || 20 || 950 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || -200 || -140 || 15.83333333 || -2216.666667 || 15.83333333 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Purchase || 10 || -130 || 20 || 2016.666667 || 15.51282051 | 
| |- | |- | ||
| − | |  | + | | Sale || 200 || 70 || 15.51282051 || 1085.897436 || 15.51282051 | 
| |} | |} | ||
| |} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:53, 25 October 2023
Simple Case
Inventory Simple Case - Avg Cost IS impacted by Sequence!!!
| 
 | 
 | 
Inventory With Reversal - All Positive
Inventory with a sale reversal, but keeping it positive! All good, but sequence matters
| Here, a purchase receipt comes between the +Reversal and -Sale record. 
 | Here, The +Reversal comes immediatelyh before the -Sale record. 
 | If sale and reversal are together - it doesn't matter the sequence! 
 | 
Inventory With Sale/Reversal - Gets Negative
| Similar to the case where items were positive, the impact of matching Negative and Postive record have no net effect even when the accumlative qty goes negative: 
 | If a purchase comes between a negative sale and reversal, the ending avg. cost is impacted, but this is still perfectly acceptable and correct handling for the data given. 
 | 
